
When Grandparents Undermine You
Two generations of parenting meeting at one kitchen table. The conflict is rarely about biscuits, and almost always about authority.
Written by Sian Trombley · BEd, MACP, CCC
You said no more sweets before dinner. A hand reached into a pocket anyway, there was a wink, and a small conspiracy formed across the table. It is affectionate. It is also, repeated over two years, a slow instruction to your child that your word is a starting offer.
Almost nobody names this problem accurately, because the surface content is trivial — biscuits, bedtimes, screen minutes, a coat not worn. Underneath, it is a question of authority: who decides how this child is raised. That question deserves a real answer, and it can be answered without a family rupture.
Three different things that all look the same
- 01Indulgence
Extra treats, later bedtimes, a film you would not have chosen. Usually harmless, occasionally inconvenient, almost never worth a confrontation.
- 02Override
You give an instruction and it is reversed in front of the child. This one matters, because it teaches the child where real power sits.
- 03Criticism
Commentary on your parenting — your child's diet, manners, diagnosis, screen use, or how you handle a meltdown. This is about the adults, and it should be handled away from the children entirely.
Write the short list
Before any conversation, decide what is actually non-negotiable. Not preferences. Non-negotiables: car seats and seatbelts, medication and allergies, supervision near water, what may be watched, whether a child is ever commented on for their body or their eating. Three to five items. Everything else you release deliberately, and you stop keeping score on it.
What to do in the moment it happens
Do not litigate it at the table. Take the smallest action that holds the line without turning the room into a courtroom: a light, unbothered redirect to the child, and the real conversation later. Your child does not need to see you win. They need to see that you were not rattled.
- To your child: 'In our house it's after dinner. You can save it for then.' Then change the subject.
- To yourself: no eye-rolling, no glance at your partner, no sighing. Children read all three fluently.
- Later, privately: one sentence, no essay, no list of previous offences.
- Never ask your child to keep a secret from a grandparent, or the reverse.
When criticism is the real issue
Comments about your parenting sting most when they touch the thing you already worry about — that you are too soft, too strict, too anxious, too indulgent of a diagnosis. The instinct is to defend with evidence. It almost never works, because the disagreement is generational rather than factual.
“You do not need them to agree that you are right. You need them to accept that you are the parent.”
When the line has to be firmer
A small number of situations require more than a boundary conversation: physical punishment, shaming a child about their body or weight, undermining a diagnosis or a treatment plan, or any behaviour that frightens the child. Here you reduce unsupervised access rather than repeat the request. That is not punishment of the grandparent. It is the job.
But most families are not in that territory. Most are one honest, unembarrassed, repeated sentence away from something workable — and from a relationship their child will be very glad to have had.
Children do not need a perfect parent. They need a predictable one who returns after hard moments.
Sian Trombley, Canadian Certified Counsellor
What you can try this week
Write your list of three
Three genuine non-negotiables — safety, health, or a clinical need. Everything else moves to the 'their house, their way' pile. A list of eleven will not be respected.
Say it in daylight, not mid-incident
Never negotiate in front of the child or across a dinner table. Ring on a Tuesday morning and say the sentence once, warmly, without a preamble of apology.
Let the blood relative lead
Whoever grew up in that family delivers the message. It lands as family business rather than a verdict from an outsider.
- Children cope easily with different rules in different homes.
- What harms them is watching the adults fight about the rules.
- Non-negotiables should be short, specific and about safety or health.
- The conversation belongs to the adult child, not the in-law spouse.
- Repeated, calm, unembarrassed repetition works better than one big confrontation.
Which of my rules is genuinely important, and which is just how I prefer things done?
Am I asking them to change, or asking them to agree that I was right?
What does my child actually see when we disagree?
Printable resources
Recommended Thrive courses

Share this article
This article is educational and is not a substitute for individual clinical advice. Comments are closed so the Journal stays a calm place to read.
Keep going
You may also like
Courses, worksheets and pathways from the same part of the library.
- Learning PathwayPositive ParentingA guided Learning Pathway from Thrive Family Company.Read
- CollectionFamily RelationshipsEverything Thrive publishes on family relationships — articles, courses, worksheets and research.Read
- Learning PathwayAnxiety & WorryA guided Learning Pathway from Thrive Family Company.Read
- CollectionAnxiety & WorryEverything Thrive publishes on anxiety & worry — articles, courses, worksheets and research.Read
- ResearchThe Research LibraryPeer-reviewed parenting and child mental health research, translated into plain language.Read
- Thrive GuideThrive GuideAsk a question and get warm, evidence-informed guidance drawn from the Thrive library.Read


